E2B vs Modal: sandbox cost and limits
Choose E2B for the lowest listed example cost: $16.56 for 100 runtime hours.
| Dimension | Winner | Margin | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100-hour compute cost | E2B | $7.236 | E2B $16.56 / Modal $23.79612 |
| Maximum configured session | Modal | 23 h | E2B Hobby 1 h / Modal Sandbox 24 h13 |
| First-month signup compute credits | E2B | $70 | E2B $100 / Modal $3012 |
Performance
| Provider | Execution host | Lifecycle control |
|---|---|---|
| E2B1 | Managed cloud | Remote sandbox API |
| Modal23 | Managed cloud | Remote sandbox API |
E2B · 2 vCPU · 4 GiB · Hobby · 1-hour Hobby session; 20 concurrent sandboxes1
Modal · 1 physical core (2 vCPU) · 4 GiB · 5-minute default lifetime; configurable to 24 hours23
Prices and request cost
Capabilities and serving conditions
| Dimension | E2B | Modal |
|---|---|---|
| Serving and capacity | The Hobby tier permits 1 hour per session. Pro raises that ceiling to 24 hours and adds $150/month before compute; the $100 signup credit applies once.1 | Sandboxes use non-preemptible rates: $0.00003942 per physical-core-second and $0.00000667 per GiB-second, rather than ordinary Function rates.2 |
When each option fits
Methodology and sources
E2B / Modal. Compute uses 100 total runtime hours, 2 vCPU and 4 GiB nominal memory, with 100% active CPU, before credits and monthly platform fees. Storage, egress and creation charges are excluded. Modal uses Sandbox non-preemptible rates; its physical core is equivalent to 2 vCPU. Runtime allocation, plan-specific concurrency and lifetime are provider conditions, not a common startup-time column. Published timing statements use different events and do not establish a cross-vendor latency ranking. E2B’s $100 signup credit is one-time; Modal’s $30 allowance recurs monthly. The credit comparison is limited to the first signup month and does not reduce the gross compute example. Session ceilings compare E2B Hobby with Modal Sandbox’s configurable 24-hour maximum, not Modal’s default timeout.
Explore Novita Sandbox
Evaluate Novita’s managed execution alongside the workload and lifecycle requirements in this comparison.