Qwen vs GPT: benchmarks and API costs
GPT-6.1 Sol leads SciCode at 54.17% versus 50.58%. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has the lower illustrated request cost at $0.0025; the other model costs $0.03.
| Dimension | Winner | Margin | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| SciCode (%) | GPT-6.1 Sol | 3.59 pp | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 50.58% / GPT-6.1 Sol 54.17%12 |
| Output speed (tokens/s) | GPT-6.1 Sol | 23.9 tokens/s | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 55.4 / GPT-6.1 Sol 79.3 tokens/s |
| AA time to first answer token (s) | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | 213.27 s | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 38.17 s / GPT-6.1 Sol 251.44 s |
| Estimated request cost | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | $0.0275 | 10K + 1K: Qwen3.8-Flash-Next $0.0025 / GPT-6.1 Sol $0.0334 |
AA coding quality benchmarks
Performance
| Metric | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) |
|---|---|---|
| Output speed (tokens/s) | 55.4 | 79.3 |
| AA time to first answer token (s) | 38.17 | 251.44 |
Prices and request cost
| Metric | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.24 | $23 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.54 | $103 |
| Context window (tokens)123 | 262,1445 | 1,050,000 |
| Max output (tokens) | 131,0726 | 128,0003 |
Coding, reasoning, context and cost
Reasoning benchmark
Context window (tokens)
Methodology and sources
SciCode is AA’s scientific-coding evaluation, reported as a percentage; higher is better. It is separate from the 10,000-input-token performance test and is not an in-editor Cline evaluation. Quality and performance use the configurations shown beside the model names. A current AA v5 Intelligence Index is displayed only where both models have a published value. AA performance uses the 10,000-input-token benchmark at each model’s displayed configuration; reasoning settings vary by model. Output speed is the median output rate. Answer latency measures the first answer token after reasoning, not the initial streamed reasoning chunk. For non-streamed reasoning and non-reasoning models, AA reports the same first-chunk and first-answer event. AA estimates answer latency from initial response and reasoning duration; it is not a separately sampled median. These are reference deployments, not Novita endpoint guarantees. The uncached cost example bills 10,000 input and 1,000 output tokens at each named seller’s tariff; it is not the cost of the AA benchmark. Prices, context and output limits use the cited seller sources.
- Artificial Analysis · Qwen3.8-Flash-Next · quality and performance
- Artificial Analysis · GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) · quality and performance
- OpenAI · GPT-6.1 Sol · API pricing and limits
- Lyceum · Qwen3.8-Flash-Next · API pricing and limits
- Lyceum · Qwen3.8-Flash-Next · native context specification
- Lyceum · serverless request limits
Build with Novita Model APIs
Create an API key and connect your application.